THE JUDICIARY CARTEL’S CONTROLLING ROLE IN THE MURDER OF LEE HARVEY OSWALD IS CLEAR. HERE’S HOW.
The Birth of the Judiciary Cartel
The Runnymede Report is about objective realities and hard evidence. It is not about speculative theories that cannot be proved one way or the other.
The Runnymede Report has compiled the data that irrefutably establishes that the judiciary cartel knowingly and intentionally controlled the circumstances that caused the murder of Lee Harvey Oswald, that was technically executed by Jack Ruby. (Who were these judiciary overseers? They were all the prosecutors, the state bar officials and the judges). It did so by collectively standing down while DA Wade tainted Oswald’s legal right to be presumed innocent through the news media instead of prosecuting his case where it belonged. That would have been in the courtroom free from that taint. This was in absolute contravention against all the publicity rules of conduct. It’s called professional misconduct at its worst.
The Judiciary Cartel Stands Down in the Face of Duty
Their collective standing down, while Wade went rogue, ensured that Oswald’s absolute legal right to be presumed innocence — all the way up to a jury verdict — would be destroyed. Indeed, his murder, under the control of the judiciary cartel, ensured that he couldn’t even get to trial at all.
With that established, here are the specifics of what happened per the investigative findings of the Runnymede Report. On Friday night, of the assassination weekend, DA Henry Wade charged Lee Harvey Oswald with the murder of the president on national television. From that point forward, Wade chose to use the news media to try his case against Oswald, rather than the courtroom. At the same time, the judiciary cartel officials were under a continuing duty to prevent that DA from trying his case against Oswald through the news media.
The Judiciary Cartel Underwrites DA Wade as He Sets the Table for a Lynch Mob Atmosphere Against Oswald
DA Wade, without fear of consequence from these judiciary overseers, then proceeded to knowingly and intentionally launch an overwhelming illicit crusade of demonization against Oswald through the news media. He did it from Friday night all the into Sunday morning. In doing so, he made for a lynch mob atmosphere against Oswald.
The judiciary cartel, like the rest of the nation, observed all this. Had the officials of the judiciary, at any point between Friday night and Sunday Morning, intervened to publicly confront Wade’s professional misconduct in condemning Oswald through the media, a lynch mob atmosphere would have been stifled. Indeed, no one (such as Jack Ruby) would have been targeting Oswald to have him killed if even one of these judiciary officials had stepped forward to publicly announce that Oswald was presumed innocent and not presumed guilty. After all, this was their solemn duty under the rules of conduct to do so as it was for all lawyer members of the legal profession.
In that context, not only did these judiciary officials refuse to carry out their duty, but they never have owned up to their wrongdoing for the next 61 years. The blood that was on their hands in 1963 is still the blood on their hands. Furthermore, by sleight of hand, the legal commentators and the civil liberties organizations operated as front organizations in providing perfect cover to keep these corrupt wrongs hidden for all these years.
From an overarching view, the reader can get a glimpse of the magnitude of this judiciary breach of duty. Consider the following data roundup of these judiciary eyewitnesses to DA Wade’s professional misconduct and what they did or didn’t do to protect Oswald’s legal right to be presumed innocent:
1. 3,143 county prosecutors: All of them did nothing
2. 150 state bar officials: All of them did nothing
3. 30,000 state judges: All of them did nothing
4. 856 federal judges: All of them did nothing
5. 93 U.S. Attorneys: All of them did nothing
This is a conservative total because it does not include their assistants. Nor does it include all the tens of thousands of American lawyers who were also, under this duty. Also, there are fifty state bar associations. The one hundred fifty figure is based on the average of three top bar officials per state.
Below is a diagram that descriptively sums up what happened: