Breaking up the Corrupt Lawfare in New York Against Donald Trump
Alvin Bragg, Manhattan, New York Prosecutor, who took the lead in wrongfully taking away Donald Trump’s constitutional right to be presumed innocent — through the news media — in the so-called hush-money prosecution
Mark F. Pomerantz, Former Lead Prosecutor in Alvin Bragg’s Prosecution Team, who also wrongfully took away Donald Trump’s constitutional right to be presumed innocent — through the news media — in the so-called hush-money prosecution
Judge Juan Merchan, who presided over the so-called hush-money trial against Donald Trump while condoning the above wrongdoing of DA Alvin Bragg and Former Lead Prosecutor Mark F. Pomerantz, thereby assuring that Donald Trump could not get a fair and impartial jury trial.
BREAKING UP THE CORRUPT LAWFARE IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK
The State of New York legal system is totally broken. It has a system of checks and balances that is designed to prevent corruption committed by prosecutors, lead prosecutors and judges. Yet, it has become totally broken because the license officials, known as the state bar overseers, refused to correct professional misconduct that was in their plain view. And then state judges went along with them ensuring that the corruption was complete.
It all came to utter ruination in the so-called hush-money illicit prosecution against Donald Trump.
What is the Proof?
As documented in the newsletter entitled: “What If Donald Trump Found Out?” (here is the link: https://therunnymedereport.substack.com/p/what-if-donald-trump-found-out): here is what happened in the so-called hush money prosecution against Donald Trump:
The prosecutor (Alvin Bragg) and his lead assistant (Mark Pomerantz) colluded with the news media (the New York Times, CNN, and the Simon and Schuster publishing house) to make Trump look like a criminal
In a multitude of collusion events
Before the criminal prosecution against him had gotten to trial
So as to influence the jury against him and thereby ruin his legal and constitutional right to be presumed innocent
All of which was prohibited under the rules of conduct regulating this prosecutor and his lead assistant (See New York Professional Rules of Conduct Rule 3.6(a), 3.6(b)(1), 3.6(b)(4), 3.6(b)(5) and 3.8(Comment 5) and ABA Model Rules 3.6(a), 3.6(a) (Comment 5) and 3.8(f) See the links to both here: https://nysba.org/app/uploads/2024/02/20240226-Rules-of-Professional-Conduct-as-amended-6.10.2022.pdf?srsltid=AfmBOorvCDw7KB3BWHlKtbqOxaEKxsNKmMWZiKX_gvn3gPAZe_GkVuuX and https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/model_rules_of_professional_conduct_table_of_contents/
All of which was approved by the presiding judge, Juan Merchan
All of which was approved by the state bar association (the Grievance
Committee of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of
New York)
As a result of all the above, Donald Trump was denied a Fair and Impartial Trial in violation of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States of America
Culminating in Donald Trump being convicted from the wrongdoers malfeasance on 34 FELONY COUNTS
If That’s the Problem, as shown in the above Documented Proof, then What is the Solution?
This is, indeed, the core foundational question. Since all the above actors were involved in this systematic evil of the New York legal system, then how can it be fixed? It cannot be fixed by Appeal. An Appeal can never fix MALFEASANCE.
Like with any internal corruption, the only way to fix MALFEASANCE is from an external source. One such source is the executive branch of the federal government.
Invoking the Federal Supremacy Clause to Fix Corrupt New York Lawfare
The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution states in pertinent part: “The Constitution, and the Laws which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; … shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby …”
What does this mean? It means that whenever a person’s fair trial constitutional rights have been violated by virtue of statewide lawfare collusion, then the federal government has the power to clean out this corruption. The designated force to do the cleaning up would be the executive branch of the government, headed by the president, which in this case is Donald Trump, the very victim of this collusion corruption in the New York’s so-called hush-money criminal prosecution.
It thus means that the President of the United States (by virtue of Article II Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution) has the power vested in him to invoke the Supremacy Clause to implement an investigation against the wrongdoing New York Lawfare officials through the president’s attorney general . That person is Attorney General Pam Bondi. The investigation would be for investigating the wrongful taking out of the fair trial rights of Donald Trump under the U.S. Constitution’s Fifth and Sixth amendment and the Rules of Professional Conduct of New York (in concert with the ABA Model Rules) which governs all New York prosecutors, other lawyers and judges.
Who Would be Implicated for Wrongdoing in this so-called hush-money criminal prosecution against Donald Trump?
The list would include, but not be limited to: Prosecutor Alvin Bragg, Former Lead Prosecutor Mark F. Pomerantz, Presiding Judge Juan Merchan and all the licensing officials of the New York State Bar (the Grievance Committee of the Appellate Division of The Supreme Court of the State of New York).
What is the Forfeiture Penalty for the Wrongdoing?
Under the direction of this federal investigation through the Supremacy Clause and upon a showing that these claims of lawfare corruption are true in New York, justice demands that all these wrongdoers must be disbarred for colluding to violate the fair and impartial trial rights of Donald Trump. In doing so, it sends a clear message that corruption in the legal system will no longer be tolerated.
The Supremacy Clause in Action
Because the U.S. Constitution is the “supreme Law of the Land,” and because the state government lawfare officials violated it through statewide collusion, the federal government, through the president’s attorney general (Pam Bondi) has the power to account for these violations through the state government’s disbarment power. Not only that, but the federal government has the power to invoke this clause because “Judges in every State shall be bound thereby. “Judges in every State shall be bound thereby” includes the “Judges” of the State of New York. In that framework, the uncorrupted “Judges” would need be the ones to carry out the multiple disbarment of these wrongdoers in this so-called hush-money case.
What Does Disbarment Mean for those Unfamiliar with Law?
Disbarment means that these law officials can no longer be lawyers in any capacity forever.